Which of the following is NOT a method of documenting removed equipment?

The correct choice indicates that "Return for disposal" is not considered a method of documenting removed equipment. Documentation methods typically involve tracking the status and condition of equipment that is either being sent for repair, scrapped, or scheduled for further diagnosis.

When equipment is sent for repair, the documentation would include details about the nature of the repair, the timeline, and any follow-up actions needed. Similarly, if equipment is deemed not repairable and is marked for scrapping, proper documentation reflects that decision and any associated procedures for disposal. Scheduling for diagnosis signifies that further evaluation is necessary, and again, this involves documentation to capture what equipment is being assessed and the expected timeline for that assessment.

In contrast, "Return for disposal" lacks the specific tracking and status updates that characterize proper documentation methods. It suggests simply returning the equipment to be discarded without a detailed process of how it was handled, which is why it does not fit with the other methods that involve more thorough record-keeping.